Starlight vs
Clay

Clay's enrichment is the best in outbound, and if you enjoy building systems you'll get a lot out of it. Starlight is the opposite trade: there's nothing to build. Describe your buyer, and the list, the research, and the emails are already done.

Free plan, no credit card. Every message waits for your approval.

One prompt searches the web for your best-fit buyers

See the difference

How Starlight and Clay actually differ, row by row.

Starlight vs Clay: a feature-by-feature comparison
FeatureStarlightClay
Core modelDescribe your buyer; the agents do the restBuild the table, the waterfall, and the logic yourself
Setup effortOne sentence and a briefReal learning curve; plays take hours to build
EnrichmentBuilt-in research and enrichment per leadWaterfall across 150+ providers, best in class
Outreach writingWritten per person, then scored before you see itAI columns you prompt, then hand to a sequencer
Sending and follow-upEmail and LinkedIn follow-ups, sent in their working hoursBasic built-in sequencer, or export to a sending tool
Human reviewEvery message approved before sendWhatever your downstream sequencer does
SchedulingNative booking pages and links includedNot offered
Entry pricingFree plan, then pay for what you use, from $12/moFree tier, then $167/mo (Launch)
SeatsNo per-seat feesUnlimited seats on all plans

Where Starlight is the better fit

  • There's nothing to build. The searching, scoring, research, writing and follow-up already work together, rather than being columns you wire up yourself.
  • Outreach is the product, not the last column of a spreadsheet. Multi-step email and LinkedIn follow-ups, a quality score on every message, reply drafts, and booking.
  • Priced for one person: free to start, then $12 a month, against Clay's $167 entry plan.
  • Agents run on a schedule and re-plan their own searches, so pipeline keeps arriving without you opening the tool.

Where Clay is strong

  • The strongest enrichment layer in the category. Waterfalling 150+ providers means Clay fills fields nobody else fills, and you only pay for the credit that hits.
  • Genuine flexibility: if you can describe a GTM play as a table plus some logic, Clay can probably build it, including plays no product would ship as a feature.
  • A large template library and an unusually active community, so most common plays already exist as something you can copy.
  • Unlimited seats on every plan, including free, which is rare and matters for teams.

What using it actually looks like

You describe the buyer. Starlight does the rest, and shows you its work.

Starlight's search page, where an ideal customer is described in plain language

Describe the buyer. That's the setup. One sentence about who you're trying to reach. Starlight works out the searches, runs them, and keeps digging once the obvious results run out.

A Starlight contact record showing a match score and the reasoning behind it

Bad-fit prospects never reach you. Everyone is scored against your ideal customer before you see them, with the reasoning shown. You spend your attention on the ones worth having.

Starlight's metrics dashboard with a written summary above the charts

You'll know if it's working. Your numbers come with a plain-English read on what changed and what to do next, instead of a dashboard you have to interpret yourself.

AI outreach you'd put your name on.

The worry with an AI sales agent is simple: what is it saying to people, and would you have said it? Starlight answers that by showing you. Every draft is graded before it reaches you, and the weak ones are rewritten automatically.

  • Grounded

    Every claim traces back to something real about that person or their company. Invented details get caught.

  • Human

    It has to read like you wrote it on a good day, not like a template with the gaps filled in.

  • On brief

    It does what you actually asked for. Ask for a reply and it won't quietly push for a call instead.

What's left takes a few seconds each to approve, edit, or delete. Once an agent has earned it, you can let it send on its own.

Starlight's Messages page showing drafted outreach waiting for review and approval
5xMore replies to cold outreach
3xMore qualified meetings per rep
50%More pipeline per rep in 90 days
5xFaster from first touch to booked
60%Fewer leads lost to slow follow-up

Why teams pick Starlight over Clay

Clay is a workbench, and that's meant as a compliment: the enrichment is the best in the category, and a good operator can assemble plays in it that no packaged product would ever ship. The catch is that the play is yours to build, maintain, and debug, and the first paid plan is $167 a month before you've sent a single email.

Starlight is a tool for people who want the play to already exist. You write a sentence describing the buyer and a brief describing the pitch, and the agent handles the searching, the scoring, the research, the writing across email and LinkedIn, the follow-up timing, and the reply drafts. The output lands in a review queue with a quality score on every message. There is no table to design, which also means there is no table to fix at eleven at night.

Clay wins when enrichment coverage is genuinely your bottleneck, or when you have an operator who enjoys building systems. For most small teams neither is true: the bottleneck is that nobody has time to build anything, and $167 a month is a lot to pay for a workbench nobody has opened. Starlight is the finished version of the play you would have built in Clay, free to start and $12 a month after that.

Read more: How Starlight's agents work·Natural-language lead search·Starlight vs Apollo.io

Frequently
asked questions

Don't see the answer you're looking for? Get in touch.

For the outbound half, yes. Starlight finds leads, researches them, writes the messages, sends the follow-ups, and books the meetings. For pure data engineering (waterfall enrichment across dozens of providers, custom columns feeding your warehouse), Clay is a different and better tool, and some teams run both.
Usually not. Starlight enriches every lead from established B2B data providers and researches the person and their company on the open web before writing a word. Waterfall enrichment earns its keep when you need unusual fields nobody else carries; for finding the right people and saying something true to them, the research Starlight already does is what actually shows up in the email.
Both have a free tier, but the step up is very different: Clay's first paid plan is $167 a month, Starlight's is $12. If you're one person still testing whether outbound works for you at all, that's the difference between a decision and an experiment.

See what it writes in ten minutes

Start free, describe your ideal customer, and read the sequence an agent comes back with. No credit card, no demo call, nothing to set up.

Other comparisons

View all comparisons →

Competitor details and pricing reflect public positioning as of 2026-08-11. Spotted something out of date? Let us know.